![]() The difference of essence or condition can also be analogized to the Spanish ser (essence) and estar (condition), if that helps. The object was not always complicated, but has become so: some actor complicated it. Is there are rule when to use opened vs open I always get confused even though I've been speaking English as the dominant language for more than half my life.E.g. Here, complex describes the essence of the object, while complicated describes its condition. The use of the perfect does not always specify when the action took place, but we know that it did.Īnother example of this divide is complex (aorist) versus complicated (perfect). Perfect, on the other hand, is a past form that emphasizes the completion. It can be considered as ignoring the verb-ness of the verb, if we consider the verb the action. Nonetheless, I find the aspects interesting and useful.)Īorist is a past verb form that does not refer to "duration or completion" (NOAD). (In actuality open is an adjective, not a verb, and English doesn't use the aorist. To get briefly technical, open can be considered the aorist aspect and opened as the perfect aspect. *interestingly there is no aorist form of closed The use of opened indicates a larger history for the object that open entirely ignores. ![]() The door was once closed*, and someone or something changed it. Both refer to the same current state, but opened opens the door to an earlier narrative, if you will. Open does not refer to any past event, while opened does.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |